ENVIRONMENTAL 
RESULTS 

Gladstone Healthy Harbour Partnership GHHP report card

AREA: 7.71 km2

 ABOUT THE ZONE 

The Calliope River is fed by Gladstone Harbour’s largest freshwater catchment. The river’s main tributaries include Oakey, Paddock, Double and Larcom creeks. The Calliope River flows into the Western Basin and is a source of turbid freshwater during floods or other high flow events. The WICET and RG Tanna’s coal terminal are located at the mouth of the Calliope Estuary. Queensland’s largest coal-fired power station is located alongside the Calliope Estuary, approximately 4km upstream from the river mouth and has been operating since 1976.

This zone has three water and sediment monitoring sites, two fish monitoring sites, one mud crab monitoring site and one mangrove monitoring sub-zone.

Gladstone Healthy Harbour Partnership GHHP report card

 WATER & SEDIMENT 

WATER

SEDIMENT

Calliope Estuary received an overall water quality score of 0.94 (A). This score was based on the scores for physicochemical (0.95), nutrients (0.86) and dissolved metals (1.00).

 

Sediment quality of Calliope Estuary was very good with an overall score of 0.95 (A).

 MEASURES RESULTS 

WATER

SEDIMENT

pH = acidity    TN = Total nitrogen   TP = Total phosphorus   Chl-a = Chlorophyll-a   Al = Aluminum   Cu = Copper   Pb = Lead   Mn = Magnesium   Ni = Nickel   Zn = Zinc

As = Arsenic   Cd = Cadmium   Cu = Copper   Hg = Mercury   Pb = Lead   Ni = Nickel   Zn = Zinc

Very good (0.85-1.00)

Poor (0.25-0.49)

Good (0.65-0.84)

Satisfactory (0.5-0.64)

Very Poor (0.00-0.24)

No Grade.png

No data available

Calliope Estuary received a very good score of 1.00 for pH indicating that the average pH was well within the guideline value range. This zone received a very good score for turbidity (0.89) indicating that average turbidity was well below the guideline value.

 

All six dissolved metals received very good scores (1.00) indicating that average concentrations were well below the water quality guideline values.

Calliope Estuary received a very good overall score for nutrients (0.86). Total phosphorus (0.94) and chlorophyll-a (0.97) had very good scores and total nitrogen had a good score (0.67), indicating that average concentrations for these measures were below the guideline values for this zone.

Gladstone Healthy Harbour Partnership GHHP report card

 HABITATS 

MANGROVE RESULTS

Very good (0.85-1.00)

Good (0.65-0.84)

Satisfactory (0.5-0.64)

Poor (0.25-0.49)

Very Poor (0.00-0.24)

No Grade.png

No data available

The overall score for Calliope Estuary was 0.58 (C) indicating mangroves were in satisfactory condition in this zone. Mangrove extent (0.80) received a good score and canopy condition (0.48) and shoreline condition (0.47) were poor.

 

The overall score for Calliope Estuary fell from 0.67 in 2018 to 0.58 in 2019. This was largely a result of changes in canopy condition where the score declined from 0.61 in 2018 to 0.48 and a decline in shoreline condition from 0.56 to 0.47 in 2019. This may reflect the impacts off decreased rainfall over the reporting year and increased shoreline erosion.

Gladstone Healthy Harbour Partnership GHHP report card

 FISH & CRABS 

 FISH HEALTH RESULTS 

HARBOUR SCORE

VISUAL FISH CONDITION: HARBOUR SCORE

FISH HEALTH ASSESSMENT INDEX: HARBOUR SCORE

Very good (0.85-1.00)

Poor (0.25-0.49)

Good (0.65-0.84)

Satisfactory (0.5-0.64)

Very Poor (0.00-0.24)

No Grade.png

No data available

Fish Health (Overall)

The overall score calculated for fish health in 2021 was 0.82 (B), which is an average of the scores for Visual Fish Condition 0.74 (B) and the Health Assessment Index 0.90 (A).

Visual Fish Condition:

The overall score for the visual fish condition is an average of 0.97 (A) for Fish Visual Assessment (FVA) and 0.50 (C) for Fish Body Condition (FBC).

The high scores for FVA are a result of a low incidence of poor visual health. All fish species assessed for this metric received very good scores ranging from 0.94 (A) to 0.98 (A). This result was similar to the HAI scores for external measures where a very low number of external health issues were recorded.

The satisfactory score for FBC in 2021 was a result of poor scores for yellow-finned bream (0.47) and pikey bream (0.48). Both species assessed had a mean body condition below the long-term average (2003 – 2020). However, the remaining three species assessed all had satisfactory scores ranging from 0.54 to 0.55.

Fish Health Assessment Index:

The overall HAI score for Gladstone Harbour was 0.90 (A).

This was comprised of scores from five fish species, barramundi 0.98 (A), barred javelin 0.90 (A) and blue catfish 0.81 (B), bream 0.98 (A) and mullet 0.81 (B).

In general, the surveyed fish species showed very few signs of external health issues, a similar result to the Visual Fish Condition sub-indicator. Scores for internal organs were also low indicating good to very good fish health.

 FISH RECRUITMENT RESULTS 

Fish recruitment was assessed for two species: yellow-finned bream Acanthopagrus australis and pikey bream Acanthopagrus pacificus. The overall score for 2021 was 0.62 (C) similar to the 2020 score of 0.64. The final scores were measured against a 2012 to 2020 baseline. The 2021 score for fish recruitment indicates a season with higher recruitment rate (increased catch rate) relative to the mean reference level determined over the baseline period. The total number of bream caught in the 2021 reporting year was 626, 329 yellow-finned bream and 297 pikey bream. Pikey bream tended to dominate in the northern sites while yellow-finned bream tended to dominate in the southern sites.

 MUD CRAB RESULTS 

Calliope Estuary is fed by Gladstone Harbour’s largest freshwater catchment. Main tributaries of the Calliope River include Oakey, Paddock, Double and Larcom creeks.

The overall zone score for Calliope Estuary was 0.47 indicating a poor condition for mud crabs. The overall zone score showed an improvement from the very poor score in 2020 (0.19). This was a result of improved scores for all three sub-indicators—with conditions shown as very poor for sex ratio (0.14), poor for abundance (0.26) and very good for prevalence of rust lesions (1.00).