ENVIRONMENTAL
RESULTS
AREA: 7.71 km2
ABOUT THE ZONE
The Calliope River is fed by Gladstone Harbour’s largest freshwater catchment. The river’s main tributaries include Oakey, Paddock, Double and Larcom creeks. The Calliope River flows into the Western Basin and is a source of turbid freshwater during floods or other high flow events. The WICET and RG Tanna’s coal terminal are located at the mouth of the Calliope Estuary. Queensland’s largest coal-fired power station is located alongside the Calliope Estuary, approximately 4km upstream from the river mouth and has been operating since 1976.
This zone has three water and sediment monitoring sites, two fish monitoring sites, one mud crab monitoring site and one mangrove monitoring sub-zone.
WATER & SEDIMENT
WATER
SEDIMENT
Calliope Estuary received an overall water quality score of 0.81 (B). This score was based on the scores for physicochemical (0.76), nutrients (0.68) and dissolved metals (1.00).
Sediment quality of Calliope Estuary was very good with an overall score of 0.97 (A).
MEASURES RESULTS
WATER
SEDIMENT
pH = acidity TN = Total nitrogen TP = Total phosphorus Chl-a = Chlorophyll-a Al = Aluminum Cu = Copper Pb = Lead Mn = Magnesium Ni = Nickel Zn = Zinc
As = Arsenic Cd = Cadmium Cu = Copper Hg = Mercury Pb = Lead Ni = Nickel Zn = Zinc
Very good (0.85-1.00)
Poor (0.25-0.49)
Good (0.65-0.84)
Satisfactory (0.5-0.64)
Very Poor (0.00-0.24)
No data available
Calliope Estuary received a very good score of 1.00 for pH indicating that the average pH was well within the guideline value range. This zone received a satisfactory score for turbidity (0.51) indicating that average turbidity was below the guideline value.
All six dissolved metals received very good scores (0.99-1.00) indicating that average concentrations were well below the water quality guideline values.
Calliope Estuary received a good overall score for nutrients (0.68). Total phosphorus (0.79) and chlorophyll-a (0.72) had good scores while total nitrogen had a satisfactory score (0.53), indicating that average concentrations for these measures were below the guideline values for this zone.
HABITATS
MANGROVE RESULTS
Very good (0.85-1.00)
Good (0.65-0.84)
Satisfactory (0.5-0.64)
Poor (0.25-0.49)
Very Poor (0.00-0.24)
No data available
The overall score for Calliope Estuary was 0.58 (C) indicating mangroves were in satisfactory condition in this zone. Mangrove extent (0.80) received a good score and canopy condition (0.48) and shoreline condition (0.47) were poor.
The overall score for Calliope Estuary fell from 0.67 in 2018 to 0.58 in 2019. This was largely a result of changes in canopy condition where the score declined from 0.61 in 2018 to 0.48 and a decline in shoreline condition from 0.56 to 0.47 in 2019. This may reflect the impacts off decreased rainfall over the reporting year and increased shoreline erosion.
FISH & CRABS
FISH HEALTH RESULTS
HARBOUR SCORE
OVERALL VISUAL FISH CONDITION: HARBOUR SCORE
VISUAL FISH CONDITION: HARBOUR SCORE
FISH HEALTH ASSESSMENT INDEX: HARBOUR SCORE
Very good (0.85-1.00)
Good (0.65-0.84)
Satisfactory (0.5-0.64)
Poor (0.25-0.49)
Very Poor (0.00-0.24)
No data available
Fish Health (Overall)
The overall score calculated for fish health in 2022 was 0.80 (B), which is an average of the scores for Fish Condition 0.72 (B) and the Health Assessment Index 0.90 (A).
Visual Fish Condition:
The overall score for Fish Condition (0.72) is an average of 0.97 (A) for Fish Visual Condition (FVC) and 0.47 (D) for Fish Body Condition (FBC).
The high scores for FVC are a result of a low incidence of poor visual health. All fish species assessed for this metric received very good scores ranging from 0.90 (A) to 0.98 (A). This result was similar to the HAI scores for external measures where a very low number of external health issues were recorded.
The poor score for FBC in 2022 was a result of poor scores for yellow-finned bream (0.43), pikey bream (0.46) dusky flathead (0.43), and barred javelin (0.44). Almost all species assessed had a mean body condition below the long-term average (2003 – 2021). However, the remaining species assessed, mangrove jack, had a satisfactory score of 0.50.
Fish Health Assessment Index (HAI):
The overall HAI score for Gladstone Harbour was 0.90 (A), as data from the 2021 Gladstone Harbour Report Card was reused.
This was comprised of scores from five fish species, barramundi 0.98 (A), barred javelin 0.90 (A) and blue catfish 0.81 (B), bream 0.98 (A) and mullet 0.81 (B).
In general, the surveyed fish species showed very few signs of external health issues, a similar result to the Fish Visual Condition sub-indicator. Scores for internal organs were also low indicating good to very good fish health.
FISH RECRUITMENT RESULTS
Fish recruitment was assessed for two species: yellow-finned bream Acanthopagrus australis and pikey bream Acanthopagrus pacificus. The overall score for 2022 was 0.57 (C) similar to the 2020 score of 0.62. The final scores were measured against a 2012 to 2021 baseline. The 2022 score for fish recruitment indicates a season with higher recruitment rate (increased catch rate) relative to the mean reference level determined over the baseline period. The total number of bream caught in the 2022 reporting year was 764, 316 yellow-finned bream and 448 pikey bream.
MUD CRAB RESULTS
Calliope Estuary is fed by Gladstone Harbour’s largest freshwater catchment. Main tributaries of the Calliope River include Oakey, Paddock, Double and Larcom creeks.
The overall zone score for Calliope Estuary was 0.43 indicating a poor condition for mud crabs. This was a similar result to the previous year when Calliope Estuary received a score of 0.47. Sub-indicator scores were mixed. With sex ratio receiving a poor score (0.29), abundance receiving a very poor score (0.00) and prevalence of rust lesions receiving a very good score (1.00).